Excerpts from a speech by Secretary of Agriculture under the Eisenhower Administration, Ezra Taft Benson:

"Your children will live under communism." Khrushchev said.
"On the contrary," Secretary Benson replied, "My grandchildren will live in freedom as I hope that all people will."

Khrushchev then retorted: "You Americans are so gullible. No, you won't accept Communism outright; but we'll keep feeding you small doses of Socialism until you will finally wake up and find that you already have Communism. We won't have to fight you; we'll so weaken your economy, until you fall like overripe fruit into our hands."

It took exactly 52 years for this prophecy to come true!

Will We Permit this Atrocity to be perpetrated on the Children of America? Will you stand up and protect the rights of millions of children and take back our country.

If the Russian Communists invaded our country would you not take up arms to protect the United States and its citizens? We have invited them in with our laziness and appeasement mentality. Unwilling to get into the fight for those truths we hold dear!

The final shots of the revolution occurred during the recent Bailout Fiasco of the housing market. The $700 Billion dollar bailout and their Battle-Cry was that it must be done immediately or we would fall into a catastrophic Super-Depression.

The End didn’t occur but something equally as bad. The beginning of the Nationalizing movement and take over of our country and Free Enterprise System!

Bailout is a Code Word for Nationalization - changing something from private to state ownership or control

Nationalizing Commerce and Industry is a tactic of dictatorships and Communist countries. Not a Free Capitalist Republic like the United States.

WRONG! BECAUSE IT HAPPENED RIGHT IN FRONT OF OUR EYES!

First we have the AIG situation and the Fannie Mae debacle, now the Automotive Industry is up next and then it will be the Health Care Industry!

We are on a Marxist Slide of Biblical Proportions and this has been done to date without a Shot being Fired!

Mark my words the next Battle Cry will be Gun Control and a seizure of the Gun Manufacturing and Bullet making industry so no one can raise arms against these thieves and traitors!  There is NO honor amongst these thieves who are stealing the future of our children right before our eyes!

Hope & Change – Code Words for Communization

the process of communizing or being communized.

The Result will be that they STEAL our “HOPE” and our way of life will be “CHANGED” Forever!

com·mu·nized, com·mu·niz·ing, com·mu·niz·es

1. To subject to public ownership or control.

2. To convert to Communist principles or control.

They have an entire code language of soft sounding words that countless numbers of Americans have been lulled to sleep with and have swallowed the Kool-Aid of Bailouts, Redistribution of Wealth, Take from the Mean, Selfish, Self-Centrered Rich people who have built wealth without considering to give it away to all Americans.

Do they really think their Wealth belongs to them! This statement was made on TV and captured in an interview with a Democratic Party Member.

The Democratic Party - Who are we battling against? 

We are now in a battle against a party that is filled with people that are followers of Saul Alinsky a Devout Marxist…this is the mentor and hero of Barack Obama.

Knowledge is Power and if you are uninformed you will be slaughtered. Google is not yet concealing or doing the bidding of Censorship quite yet for the Obama regime. So get educated while the information is still available.

Read through the following excerpts and description and see how many tactics were used on the American people during the recent election and the out of control Democratic Party running their socialist and Marxist agenda against the unsuspecting Republicans who were to be on Guard for our interests and preservation.

Saul Alinsky and DNC Corruption

By Diane Alden

Jan. 7, 2003

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Saul Alinsky died in 1972. He was a Marxist grassroots organizer who spent much of his life organizing rent strikes and protesting conditions of the poor in Chicago in the 1930s. However, unlike Christian socialist and activist for the poor Dorothy Day, Alinsky's real claim to fame was as strategist for anti-establishment '60s radicals and revolutionaries.

Indeed, Alinsky wrote the rule book for '60s radicals like Bill and Hillary Clinton, George Miller and Nancy Pelosi. He considered Hillary Rodham to be one of his better students and asked her to join him in his efforts as an organizer of radical leftist causes. But Hillary had other fish to fry on her climb to national prominence.

Alinsky had a true genius for formulating tactical battle plans for the radical left. He wrote two books outlining his organizational principles and strategies: "Reveille for Radicals" (1946) and "Rules for Radicals" (1971).

"Rules for Radicals" begins with an unusual tribute: "From all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins – or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom – Lucifer."

The devil challenged authority and got his own kingdom, and that goes to the heart of what left is really about. That of course is to get power any way you can, including lying, cheating and stealing. The ultimate rule is that the ends justify the means.

Alinsky asserted that he was more concerned with the acquisition of power than anything else: "My aim here is to suggest how to organize for power: how to get it and how to use it." This is not to be done with assistance to the poor, nor even by organizing the poor to demand assistance: "[E]ven if all the low-income parts of our population were organized ... it would not be powerful enough to get significant, basic, needed changes."

Alinsky advises his followers that the poor have no power and that the real target is the middle class:

 "Organization for action will now and in the decade ahead center upon America's white middle class.

Obama repeatedly chanted about the “Middle Class” in all of his speeches. He has no desire to help the poor because they have no cash to help him or his plans.  

The Democrats have pandered the “Ghetto” Populations as their personal Slave Plantations and used these people to grow their own “Voting Slaves” that would support them because of their continual LIES feed by countless politicians.

In 40 plus years have you ever seen any “Ghetto Plantation” disappear?

The “Union Slaves” are another sort that MUST be handled a bit different and must be PAID Off In some other fashion, because they are not “Ghetto Slaves”.

The Payoff will be the AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY BAILOUT…I mean Nationalization of the Automotive Industry for the purposes of keeping their “Union Slaves” in jobs and their ability to make Campaign Donations!

That is where the power is. ... Our rebels have contemptuously rejected the values and the way of life of the middle class. They have stigmatized it as materialistic, decadent, bourgeois, degenerate, imperialistic, war-mongering, brutalized and corrupt. They are right; but we must begin from where we are if we are to build power for change, and the power and the people are in the middle class majority."

But that didn't stop Alinsky and his followers from using the middle class for their own purposes. They counted on the guilt and shame of the white middle class to get what they wanted. In order to take over institutions and get power, the middle class had to be convinced that they were somehow lucky winners in "life's lottery."

Alinsky's radicals found a perfect vehicle for their destruction of the American system and more particularly for taking and maintaining power.

That instrument was the Democratic Party.

Transition and Transaction

The transition of the old Democratic Party to what exists today should not surprise or confound conservatives. Nor should Alinsky's tactics seem foreign. After all, for nearly 40 years, Republicans and the conservative agenda have been getting hammered by the left through the successful use of Alinsky tactics.

In that cause, radicals and the liberal-left gravitated toward the print and electronic media, toward the university professorate and the law.

The left, consciously or unconsciously, adopted Alinsky's rules.

The impact changed the nature of the Democratic Party and the direction of the United States. Increasingly, the left is succeeding in changing the nature of the Republican Party as well.

Suffice to say the greatest change has taken place in the relationship between the state and the individual. America is rapidly descending from a representative Constitutional Republic to a collectivist empire controlled by elites of one sort or another.

Alinsky's influence on the modern Democratic Party indicates that the ends do indeed justify the means. As Alinsky states in "Rules for Radicals" it was foolish to believe that means are just as important as the ends. He states that "to believe in the immaculate conception of ends and principles ... the practical revolutionary will understand ... [that] in action, one does not always enjoy the luxury of a decision that is consistent both with one's individual conscience and the good of mankind."

Sadly, not enough Republicans and conservatives learned Alinsky's rules until late in the game. A sign of hope is the fact that the new media, including talk radio and the Internet, are changing all that. One can hope it is not too late.

( Opinion – I am not so certain that the Republicans have learned anything and they are already preparing to lose the next round of elections. In addition to the current battle of Bailouts against the Democrats, which are out of control and seemingly…UNSTOPPABLE!)

In any event, Alinsky's rules include:

"Wherever possible go outside the experience of the enemy. Here you want to cause confusion, fear and retreat."

"Make the enemy live up to his/her own book of rules. You can kill them with this. They can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity."

"Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also, it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage."

"The threat is generally more terrifying than the thing itself."

"In a fight almost anything goes. It almost reaches the point where you stop to apologize if a chance blow lands above the belt."

"Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it and polarize it." (Think Gingrich, Lott and the success of name-calling used by the likes of Bill Clinton, Paul Begala, James Carville, Maxine Waters and others against conservatives and Republicans. Think of how Clinton "enemies" like Paula Jones or Linda Tripp were treated.)

Look how the Media treated the recent Vice Presidential Candidate and

Governor Sarah Palin!

"One of the criteria for picking the target is the target's vulnerability ... the other important point in the choosing of a target is that it must be a personification, not something general and abstract." (Trent Lott comes to mind. Meanwhile, a former Klansman by the name of Sen. Robert Byrd got away with saying "the N-Word " on Fox News at least three times, and he still maintains his Senate seat and power.)

"The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength." For instance, Democrats imply conservatives are racists or that Republicans want to kill senior citizens by limiting the growth of the Medicare system, they imply Republicans want to deny kids lunch money without offering real proof. These red-herring tactics work.

Of course, Republicans reaction to all this is to immediately go on the defensive. Seldom do they unleash their pit bull orators or strategists. Rather than use the immense amount of data available to prove the conservative case, Republicans tug their forelocks, say "yes sir," and hope the accusations and name calling will go away.

Why is it that Republicans consistently fail to point out the monumental failures of the new Democrats? Failures such as the massive disaster that is the "war on poverty." On that topic alone Republicans should be drilling the public in every media venue and at every opportunity. Then and only then should Republicans offer alternatives to the failed policies of the Democratic left.

Republicans should pound relentlessly on the fact that the Democratic Party was hijacked by leftist reactionaries way back in the early '70s. The reactionary left is the obstructionist left. They do nothing but defend and cling to the failures of the past. That fact makes them reactionaries rather than radicals or progressives.

Unfortunately, Republicans still pretend that nothing has changed regarding the basic philosophy of the political parties. They refuse to understand the horrendous notion that Democrats tell us the U.S. Constitution is flexible. That means the rule of law is flexible. If that is the case the law and the Constitution mean nothing. It means that the law and Constitution are twisted by the whims and fancies of the moment.

In fact, in the 2000 election Al Gore maintained the Constitution could and should be manipulated because it was "flexible." Whatever happened to the amendment process?

Bill Clinton used executive orders to circumvent Congress and the Constitution. He used the agencies of the federal government against his enemies. Clinton set an extremely dangerous precedent. Alinsky would have loved it. It is a perfect example of the use of the Rules for Radicals – ends justify the means.

Check the news and they are already clamoring about how many Executive Orders Barack Obama will change and use in his first 100 days of his administration!

Gitmo will be emptied and most likely all prisoners will be given Amnesty because Obama voted against the war or did he vote “Present”!

Hillary and Bill Clinton and other powerful former '60s radicals learned from Saul Alinsky. It is about time that a few more Republicans and/or conservatives did as well.

Alinsky in South Dakota…

Remember that Alinsky's advice was that the ends justify the means. Think of Florida in 2000 and the manipulation of military ballots. Think of Milwaukee and unattended polling places, which allowed leftist college students to take handfuls of ballots to check off. Think of a million immigrants in the 1996 election granted instant voting rights by the Clinton administration.

In a brilliant bit of investigative reporting, National Review's Byron York gave us a grand overview of the corrupt and unpleasant outline of how Alinsky's rules work during election season. Republicans, once again asleep at the switch, live in the land of euphoria. They still believe that their Democratic counterparts are among the angels on God's right.

Considering that Alinsky expresses admiration for Lucifer, they are looking in the wrong place to find many modern Democrats. Republicans still assume that the modern Democratic Party, its media sycophants, its operatives during national or state elections, will play fair. It is hard to say which is worse, Republican naïveté' or Democratic cheating and law breaking.

When Democrats cheat, especially under Bill Clinton's and Terry McAuliffe's watch, they whine when they discover they didn't cheat enough to win. When they are caught in the big lies, they expect Republicans to ignore it and give them a pass. The last election in South Dakota is a case in point.

The Election of 2008 is Full of Lies & Deception by the most prolific Alisnky follower and practioner…Barack Obama.

In the primaries and election of 2002, lawyers from Washington started showing up at polling places in the hinterlands of South Dakota. The Republican leadership and the establishment should have seen it coming but they didn't.

As Byron York relates in "Badlands, Bad Votes": "On Election Day, Noma Sazama knew something unusual was going on the moment she arrived at her polling place, the St. Thomas Parish Hall in Mission, South Dakota. Sazama, a member of the local election board, noticed several strangers in the room – an unusual sight in Mission, population 904, where most people know one another. It turned out the strangers were all lawyers, Democrats who had come to town to serve as poll watchers for the race between incumbent Democratic senator Tim Johnson and Republican John Thune. One was from Washington, D.C., another was from New York City, and a third was from California. 'There were no locals, and I've never seen that happen before,' says Sazama, who has lived in the area for 73 years."

Furthermore, York maintains, "The Democratic team of lawyers confiscated the Parish Hall kitchen only a few feet from the balloting tables."

Witnesses swore in affidavits that party hacks had rented dozens of vans and hired drivers to bring voters to the polls. Lawyers from elsewhere made the Parish Hall their headquarters. Seventy-three-year-old Ms. Sazama stated, "They had the names and time-of-pickup and whether someone voted on them, and from those he would contact the drivers."

Finally she understood that the influx of outside Democrats were going to use the polling place as their headquarters, an action which is against the laws of South Dakota.

The lawyers tied up the phones, which meant that the poll watchers and election officials could not make needed phone calls. York quotes the election supervisor: "They were on the phone using it to call I don't know where, and I needed to call because we had some new districting. They were always talking on it."

When Wanless, the election supervisor, protested, she got a chilly reaction from the out-of-towners. "I felt like they were trying to intimidate me," she recalls.

In fact, all this is against South Dakota law, which states: "No person may, in any polling place or within or on any building in which a polling place is located or within one hundred feet from any entrance leading into a polling place, maintain an office or communications center. ..."

There were no Republican lawyers or authorities around to inform election officials that it was against the law for the Democrats to be running their campaign from a polling place. That was bad enough, but ever since November Republicans have failed dismally to make it a BIG national issue.

There was also complete failure to understand Alinsky's second basic rule: "Wherever possible go outside the experience of the enemy. Here you want to cause confusion, fear and retreat." The DNC counted on the locals being intimidated by a gang of high-priced lawyers – and of course they were.

Another Alinsky rule used in the November elections in South Dakota: "In a fight almost anything goes. It almost reaches the point where you stop to apologize if a chance blow lands above the belt." In other words, what you do is count on the failure of will by your opponent to call a foul. The opponent usually believes it is easier to do nothing, it is always easier to do nothing, and so Republicans "move on."

John McCain Failed to Get into the Fight after countless millions of Americans wanted him to take off his gloves and get bloody to fight on our behalf!!!

The end-justifies-the-means cabal figures that even good people find it easier to do nothing.

The failure of Republicans to impose the rule of law on the cheaters, liars and manipulators allows those who use Alinsky's corrupt system to win. That fact tells us that the voting process means as little to our elites as does the Constitution.

Because of that fact, Republicans will lose future elections. More importantly, the people of the United States will lose.

The RNC and the GOP leadership just don't get it. Otherwise they would care enough to do something about it.

It may very well be that we need a new Revolution to take back our country. We have an enemy in our midst who will institute the “Fairness Doctrine” and other forms of silencing people and taking away our rights.

Is it so far fetched that we might have to raise arms against people who are willing to destroy all that is good in our country along with our constitution?

Patriots Unite…Question Joe Biden’s Patriotism…he is also one of the culprits who leads us down this path to destruction.